COMMITTEE EXAMINES UNDERGRADUATE EXPERIENCE,
OFFERS RECOMMENDATIONS IN MANY AREAS OF STUDENT LIFE
COLUMBUS -- The Ohio State University has taken a good, hard
look at how well it is serving its 36,000 Columbus campus
undergraduate students, and the result is a detailed list of
recommendations for improving everything from academic advising
to parking.
The Committee on the Undergraduate Experience (CUE) --
composed of 23 students and 23 faculty and staff members
appointed last spring by Provost Richard Sisson and Vice
President for Student Affairs David Williams -- spent over a year
examining the academic, social, and service components of the
university as they affect undergraduates.
In its recently released report, CUE outlines how its work
fits into Ohio State's ongoing efforts to refocus attention on
quality undergraduate education, and the committee provides
numerous examples of things that work well and things that need a
little help.
"CUE was put together and given support from the highest
levels of the university to identify what needs to be improved,"
said Martha Garland, associate dean of the College of Humanities
and CUE co-chair. "We found there are good people throughout
campus who are committed to making things better, and we
anticipate that over this summer plans will be made to adopt many
of the recommendations that we have made."
The committee found that students are generally satisfied
with their Ohio State education, but there is room for at least
some improvement in almost every aspect of the undergraduate
experience.
Two needs serve as overarching themes for the
recommendations: (1) enhancing the sense of community among Ohio
State's diverse population, and (2) enabling more students to
stay at the university through graduation.
Included at the beginning of the report is a statement of
"Mutual Respect in the Classroom" -- shared expectations for
behavior by teachers and students that emphasize preparation,
civility, respect, clarity and high standards. CUE recommends
that this statement be incorporated into the syllabus for every
class at Ohio State.
General recommendations were made in three categories:
(1) basic needs (social involvement, safety and security,
transportation, and financial issues), (2) academic experience
(first-year experience, advising, curriculum, and quality of
instruction), and (3) reducing redtape and valuing the
individual.
A student member of CUE, Yvette Hicks, a junior from
Columbus, said she is hopeful the committee's work will benefit
students. "The same problems pop up every year, just with
different players," she said. "CUE addresses these problems
and gives positive solutions."
Suggested improvements in each area include:
BASIC NEEDS
Safety and security
-- continue support for Campus Partners project for redevelopment
of the east of High Street neighborhood
-- provide alcohol-free events for students on campus
-- increase availability of safety escort services
-- install more campus emergency phones
-- install more secure bike racks
-- use new methods to advise students of crime patterns
Transportation
-- increase student participation in policy-making
-- provide reliable, frequent shuttles from parking lots at all
times of the day
-- increase proximity parking on campus
-- do not allow faculty and staff to park in student spaces
Financial issues
-- create a computerized database of campus jobs available to
students
Social activities
-- increase the number and variety of activities offered on
campus
-- expand alcohol education programs
-- stabilize and increase funding for student organizations and
event programming
Disability services
-- create a matching grants program to fund programs for the
disabled population
ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
First-year experience
-- improve system for transition into the university
-- restructure orientation, Welcome Week and survey courses
-- initiate a pilot project for "clustering" first-year
students (self-selected only) so that 20 or 30 students with the same
academic interest take the same sections of two or three
courses together, thus forming bonds and providing support for
each other
-- enhance support for the one-third of undergraduates who enter
as transfer students from other universities
Advising
-- revise structure of academic advising to provide more
professional advisers and fewer advisees per adviser
-- permit more direct enrollment into degree-granting colleges
(without first spending time in University College)
-- improve adviser/student e-mail contact
-- perfect and expand on-line programs to let students check on
their academic status, course enrollment, etc.
Curriculum
-- evaluate the General Education Curriculum for effectiveness
and flexibility
-- address the root causes of lack of space in desired courses
-- continue the progress already made to reduce closed courses
-- encourage mutual respect and shared expectations in the
classroom
Quality of instruction
-- implement an award for departments which do an outstanding job
of teaching undergraduates
-- improve teaching and encourage mutual respect in lower-level
mathematics courses
-- provide course material in accessible formats to students with
disabilities
REDUCING THE RUN-AROUND AND VALUING THE INDIVIDUAL
-- establish a Student Advocacy Center (in progress) to provide a
central place for students to find help with special problems,
get information and find support
-- create an "integrated financial services office" to
centralize and simplify business with Student Financial Aid, Fees
& Deposits, Student Loan Services, the Registrar's Office and
other university offices involved with financial transactions
with students
-- improve and integrate student databases to provide quicker,
more accurate information to students, their instructors and
advisers, and other staff who serve them
-- build on the information technology now in use for direct
student services such as registration, mailing of grades, and
financial information to provide even more responsive service
-- establish a student-centered institutional research system to
gather, analyze and make readily available the data needed to
measure the success of the university in fulfilling its mission
to students
Information for the report was gathered from focus groups, a
random phone survey of 300 undergraduates, and extensive
interviews with key individuals. In addition, 1,800 student
satisfaction inventory questionnaires were distributed to
undergraduates.
The introduction to CUE's final report states:
"During the process we tackled a variety of issues both
large and small. Our vision was to accomplish improvements as
rapidly as appropriate, with some changes taking place before our
review was concluded, with others taking place soon after, while
for others we might simply be stating a destination for the
institution to begin moving toward. We often said we wanted to
plant some annuals, some perennials, and a few oak trees as
well."
#
Contact: Martha Garland, (614) 292-1882; or Eric Busch, (614)
292-9334, co-chairs of CUE
[Submitted by: Von Reid-Vargas (ereid@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:22:38 -0400]
All documents are the responsibility of their originator.