09
July
1998
|
18:00 PM
America/New_York

Trustees: Budget, ARMS, Investments


TRUSTEES APPROVE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR

COLUMBUS -- The Ohio State University Board of Trustees on 
Friday (7/10) approved the university's current funds budget for 
fiscal year 1998-99.  The board also authorized spending $10 
million for continued implementation of the university's human 
resources and financial computer systems, and examined university 
investment policies.

Trustees approve fiscal year 1999 current funds budget

Trustees approved an operating budget for the 1998-99 fiscal 
year, which began July 1, that focuses funding to enhance the 
quality of the education and campus experience for students.

William J. Shkurti, vice president for finance, told 
trustees that the three cornerstones of the budget are continuing 
to improve the quality of academic programs, improving the 
quality of the student experience inside and outside the 
classroom, and strengthening the university's financial position 
and promoting revenue growth.

The total university current funds budget -- which includes 
general funds, earnings operations and restricted funding -- is 
projected to increase by 6.4 percent from $1.64 billion to $1.75 
billion.

The general funds operating budget is projected to increase 
3.7 percent to $670 million, including a 2.6 percent increase, to 
$305.5 million, in the state's instructional subsidy and a 4.8 
percent increase, to $280.8 million, in student fees, which have 
been adjusted slightly downward for enrollment declines partially 
attributable to the impact of the economic crisis on the 
university's Asian students.  The budget plans a reserve of $1 
million to ameliorate the impact of enrollment fluctuations.

The operating budget includes a $1.5 million reduction in 
state subsidy from previously appropriated levels.  Even so, the 
budget represents the fourth consecutive year of budget stability 
since achieving budget equilibrium in fiscal year 1995.

"During this period, significant funding increases have been 
provided to support academic priorities," Shkurti said.  "This 
has been achieved in an environment where undergraduate tuition 
has been capped by the state, federal funding interrupted and 
enrollment, as planned, has continued to decline."

In addition to the subsidy cut and uncertainty about the 
impact of the Asian economic crisis on enrollments, issues that 
could present financial challenges to the university during the 
coming year include uncertainty about primary and secondary 
school funding in Ohio, growing market pressure to remain 
competitive on faculty and staff salaries, and the university's 
aggressive list of unmet needs and continuing commitments.

In accepting the budget, trustees approved a 2 percent 
increase in general and instructional fees for resident 
undergraduates on top of the 4 percent hike that was approved at 
the June 5 meeting.  State law requires that two votes take place 
on tuition increases greater than 4 percent.

In keeping with past university practice, a portion of the 
tuition increase will be set aside for student priorities, 
including $500,000 in one-time funding for ResNet, a project 
giving every student in every residence hall room (where 85 
percent of new freshmen live) access to high-speed Internet 
service.  An additional $770,000 in continuing funding will be 
spent on other student initiatives.

General fund expenses also will increase 3.7 percent to $670 
million, including a 5.1 percent hike to $80.5 million, in the 
amount of money that is returned to students in the form of 
financial aid directly from the university.  Unit budgets will 
increase 3.7 percent to $501.9 million, which includes faculty, 
staff and student salaries and benefits.  Trustees approved in 
May a 3.5 percent increase to the salary pool.  Spending on 
support of research will increase by an inflationary 4 percent to 
$26.1 million and spending on new buildings and reducing deferred 
maintenance of university assets will increase 4.6 percent to 
$41.1 million.

Nearly $30 million in continuing funds and more than $10 
million in one-time money will be spent on the university's 
strategic priorities.  During the fiscal year, a new $6.5 million 
will be spent to directly improve academic quality, including 
library acquisitions, research support, student recruitment, the 
university's academic excellence, selective investment and summer 
enrollment initiatives, and seeding an initiative in public 
policy.

More than $7 million in new funding will go toward improving 
the student experience, including increasing financial aid, 
reducing the number of closed courses, adding new programming 
from the Office of Student Affairs and improving retention, 
student safety and technology.  A total $26 million will be spent 
on efforts that protect the university's assets and improve its 
revenue growth.  These efforts include maintaining compensation 
levels, funding supplies and services, improving the physical 
environment, complying with state and federal mandates, improving 
administrative computing, developing distance education programs 
and supporting development efforts to increase corporate and 
individual giving to the university.

"Resources alone will not improve outcomes, but comparisons 
with our benchmark institutions show that Ohio State needs to 
strengthen and diversify its revenue base," Shkurti said.  "The 
key to financial growth is a quality academic program, an 
energized research agenda and an improved student experience, so 
that the recruitment and retention objectives that support a 
strong enrollment base can be met."

Trustees OK spending on computing systems

Trustees authorized the expenditure of $10 million for 
ongoing implementation of the Administrative Resources Management 
System for human resources, general ledger and procurement 
systems.

Although the ARMS human resources installation in August 
1997 did not roll out as smoothly as hoped, many of the goals set 
for the past year have been met, Larry Lewellen, acting vice 
president for human resources, told trustees.

They include fine-tuning and implementation of a year-end 
payroll accounting system, design and implementation of systems 
for benefits open enrollment and annual salary budgeting, and 
investigating opportunities to improve college and department 
processes.

"The first year of implementation of any new system requires 
an extraordinary amount of effort by everyone involved to work 
out various conversion issues," Lewellen said.  "Benefits are not 
likely to be readily apparent until at least the second year of 
operation."

During the next year, the Office of Human Resources will 
continue to improve workflow and reporting functions for colleges 
and departments, Lewellen said.  Other areas for improvements 
include timekeeping and re-evaluation of centralized and 
decentralized system functions, he said.

Satisfaction with the ARMS software is mixed, said John 
Ellinger, ARMS project director.  "We've made some of our 
customers' requested changes and we're making progress, but we 
haven't been as successful for users as we wanted to be.  It's 
not a small task and we're continuing to work on it."

Ellinger said one aspect of the project benefiting the 
university is that successful implementation of the human 
resources and financial systems will address Year 2000 problems 
for those areas.

Goals for financial systems -- procurement and general 
ledger -- are on schedule, said William J. Shkurti, vice 
president for finance.  Both systems are still in the 
implementation and training stages, with plans for procurement to 
be up by January 1999 and general ledger in July 1999, a more 
phased in approach that was suggested based on lessons learned 
from the human resources implementation.  Some central staff will 
begin testing the financial systems this summer as a shadow 
system to their current accounting methods.  User training on 
both systems will begin full scale during autumn quarter.

"At this point in the fiscal systems, we're incorportating 
lessons we've learned from the human resources implementation 
into the process," Ellinger said, including adjustments to time 
lines, training and the method of implementing the systems.

"Delaying the implementation to the 1999 dates will cost the 
university about $10 million but should result in more effective 
implementation," Shkurti said.  "Successful implementation will 
continue to require major investment of staff and senior 
leadership time during the next two years."

ARMS for procurement will replace the systems for 
purchasing, accounts payable, equipment inventory and stores and 
receiving with one system.  The general ledger will replace the 
FAS, the financial accounting system that has been the official 
accounting record of the university since 1977.

One task for the coming year is to move toward integrating 
the procurement system with University Hospital and Research 
Foundation procurement systems, Shkurti said.

Goals for the general ledger system include resolving issues 
concerning electronic workflow, reporting and usage, as well as 
integrating with University Hospitals, Shkurti said.

User satisfaction is a priority for all the systems, 
Ellinger said.  "Our goal is to deliver a system with necessary 
changes recommended by users to make a system that closely meets 
the university's requirements," he said.

Other priorities include the degree to which work is 
decentralized, the amount of customization of the systems, 
security, training, archiving and identifying areas for savings 
and funding continuing operating costs, Shkurti said.

The ongoing process will require funding for operating 
costs, including software upgrades, even after systems are up and 
running.  "We need to continue to make improvements to reflect 
the needs of users and the university," Ellinger said.  "We do 
not want to install a system and let it sit.  As we move forward, 
we need to keep these systems current to the university."

The project will continue to work through setbacks, 
including personnel shortages. The high demand for skilled 
computer programmers in Columbus' private sector has resulted in 
difficulty in retaining technical personnel, which has cost 
nearly $1.1 million above the original project budget.  Highly 
competitive salaries in the private sector have resulted in 
approximately 30 percent turnover of the technical and support 
staff who have taken private sector jobs.

Trustees hear reports and address investment issues

The university's endowment has reached an all-time high, 
James L. Nichols, university treasurer, told trustees.  The 
endowment ended the 1998 fiscal year on June 30 at $927.8 
million, up from $767.7 million a year ago.  And that increase 
has trustees and university officials smiling.

"The endowment should hit $1 billion by the end of this 
fiscal year on June 30, 1999 -- a full year before the end of the 
Affirm Thy Friendship capital campaign," Nichols said.  "With 
just a modest 8 percent increase -- not even counting all the new 
gifts -- and we're there at $1 billion."

Nichols also discussed with trustees a proposed investment 
policy that would allow the university to invest in equities and 
bonds approximately $300 million in eligible operating funds in 
order to enhance returns.  Eligible funds would include deferred 
gifts, self-insurance funds and budgets for auxiliary units that 
are not needed for day-to-day operations.  Trustees will vote on 
the proposal in September.

Trustees also voted to approve the sale of commercial paper 
to fund construction projects, making Ohio State the first 
university in the state, public or private, to utilize the 
funding mechanism.  Commercial paper is sold much like short-term 
notes.  Bonds are sold when the funding needs for construction 
meet a critical mass.

                              #

Contacts:William J. Shkurti, vice president for finance,
614-292-9232
James L. Nichols, university treasurer, 614-292-6261

Written by David Bhaerman, 614-292-8422,
and Susan Wittstock, 614-292-8419, University Communications.